DISCLAIMER: Before we get started I need to layout a few things. First, this will be a long post. Second, this post has absolutely nothing to do with the cult of Mormonism, a.k.a. Scientology 1.0 and Finally this post has nothing to do with gay rights, anti or pro gay crap, if you go look at prior posts of mine in this blog you will see where I stand. I don't give a shit who or how you fuck in the privacy of your own bedroom. Finally this post will have foul language.
Also, I am going after the mental thought process of the author, baseless facts presented, loose connections, finding facts to fit a pre-defined conclusion and pure stupidity. Man, woman, atheist or sun worshipper. Idiots are everywhere.
OK. I am worked up and really am going to enjoy writing this.Someone very near and dear to me pointed me out to a woman. This woman has a blog, Twitter, Tumblr and a whole slew of other publicly available, freely searchable and accessible social media sites.
Recently she wrote a post about how the movie Frozen, the Disney blockbuster, is nothing more than one big gay soapbox. Prompting gayness across the land supported by the gay liberal gay media in the gay TV to our not-gay children and we as not-gay parents need to see through the fog of the gayness of Disneygay studios. Fuck.
Let's start with the author, I give free links to worthy subjects of discussion
(I am not paid in anyway for the publicity or links)
|Natural Hair Color?|
Sites: Main Blog, Google+, Twitter, Pinterest, An abandoned personal site, Tumblr, Instagram
The post in question: Frozen: Not Going To "Let It Go" When It Advocates Gay Agenda
All quotes throughout this post can be credited back to this author and site. I have to say this because I don't think I am creative enough to come up with this shit on my own.
Ready? Here we go...
Let me give you the quick synopsis of Frozen if you are unfamiliar.
Now, if you haven't been able to tell... gay.
I would take more out of Kathryn's post but the first half is nothing about the movie but more of a rant on liberal gayness. You read it. I want to focus on the connections she found.
I want to start out with the author's own personal hypocrisy in this entire rant she wrote about. If you read her whole post you get the impression that she is staunchly against the hidden messages and values that Frozen portrays. She goes on to warn us parents to keep the kids away and so on...
(Italicized colored text is from her post)
"The fact is, that not one of us would allow a person, contrary to our values, to come into our homes and teach our family many of the principles advocated in the movie Frozen - such as rebellion/disobedience - as good."
Bambi, Lion King, Brave, Snow White, Peter Pan, Aladdin, Tangled... and pretty much any other Disney movie made must have not been on your viewing list when it comes to disobedience in their protagonists.
"Ironically, I've seen Frozen three times. Not because I necessarily wanted to, but because I had three sets of grandchildren who I committed to take to see the movie when it initially came out. And as it worked out it was at different times and places. I won't deny, either, that I enjoyed watching the movie every single time, for a number of reasons. It actually gave me a good opportunity to confirm my initial reaction, and in so doing, I could blatantly see that the homosexual agenda, to normalize the practice, was not simply an underlying message in the movie Frozen, but is the actual story."
I don't care if you saw the movie three times or fifty. BUT, your disgust at the homosexual agenda that you assumed, saw and confirmed with each viewing you continued to bring new, young, innocent children to experience it. If you were a true woman of conviction, after the first viewing or the first words through your circles that Frozen is gay you wouldn't allow your own grandchildren to see it. Especially if you took them there yourself. No?
To Christian parents, who don't support the legalization of SSM, or the normalization of same-sex sexual behavior, oppositional to God, I feel strongly that we must become more aware of how liberal media advocate these messages. It is often accomplished through infiltrating mainstream channels with the specific attitudes and ideologies necessary to advance these practices, as progressive, within mainstream society.
Hold on sister. Don't generalize and think all Christian parents don't support same sex marriage. Fuck you. I am a Christian parent and in the eyes of the State and laws I support same sex marriage. I know the line of church and state and can separate them. If my church performed a same sex marriage under the words of scripture that's a different story. But SSM is not about religion it's about legal rights.
Your focus on gay marriage as the end all of religion sanctity. Fuck that. Here's a short list of all the non-gay fucked up shit that has been far more damaging to religious foundations. Divorce, children out of wedlock, AshleyMadison.com, loveless marriages, murder, government corruption...
Which is worse in your mind? Two women that have loved each other for 40 years, been loyal, raised a family....or a man and a woman who are married and when they make love the man shits in the woman's mouth while she pees on his face? In your logic the first one is far more terrible. BTW - Odds are someone within 1 mile of your home does do the other activity and enjoys it a great deal...
I find your 'Sidebar' cute. This little disclaimer doesn't absolve you from the fact that the whole post is anti-gay.
Sidebar: Let me be very clear about one thing, I am not anti-gay nor am I here to judge homosexuals not worthy of their rightful and respectful place among society. However, I draw the line at the idea of redefining traditional marriage to include homosexual relationships, as equal. Meaning, that as a Christian, I believe that acting on same-sex attraction is contrary to God's will, and therefore SSM should not be legalized. Because I hold this value and voice it freely, does not mean that I am trying to force it on anyone - anymore than those who feel opposite and advocate for their position intend to force SSM on me, personally - both have the right [to freely advocate an oppositional position] and should not be demonized, regardless of where society takes us, as a whole.
Here we go, the movie connections -
Shame is at the core of Elsa's feelings about her magical powers: same-sex attraction.
- Um OK. The power to freeze anything to wanting to chow box. Sorry, I can't get there.
Her parents' make the decision to close the castle to the public, and lock Elsa in her room so that her power won’t be discovered. Not even her sister is allowed to see and play with Elsa: demonetization of homosexuals by society.
- The text above it from her post, cut and paste (in case she changes it later)...
demonetization - To divest of monetary value.
demonization - To turn into as if into a demon
Which word do you think she meant to use?
Her sister, kept from the truth, and affected by the inflicted secrecy also becomes victim to the dysfunction of her family and experiences equal isolation and confusion: not "coming out" and being who you are meant to be (acting on the power) is harmful to the person, family and society.
- This is a correct connect. Be true to yourself. But throwing in the whole gay party here is a bit of a stretch.
Elsa must take her rightful position among her people, as queen. (Right to be queen: make what you want out of this one.) To do so, she faces great fear in going out publicly for her coronation, worrying that her powers might show because she has no control over them: rejects the ability of those with same-gender attraction to control behavior.
- The not anti-gay author throws in a stereotype joke about the word Queen. Also says that Elsa, the lesbian, won't be able to go out in public without uncontrollable muff diving.
While at the same time her sister, Anna, is beyond thrilled at the opportunity to go outside, make friends and perhaps even meet her special someone and have her happily-ever-after: heterosexuals are free to pursue happiness through sexual relationships and gays are not - making them unequal in society.
- Or a young teenage girl that's been locked up in a huge castle is horny as shit and wants to get stuffed.
After only a brief interaction, Anna and Hans decide to marry. Elsa is freaked out that her sister wants to marry someone she only just met: heterosexuals diminish marriage, freely given to them without judgment of any kind - SSM can't do any more harm.
- Did you watch the movie? Hans was a fraud and said yes because he wanted into the royal line. This is more a point of a loveless marriage for the sake of social status. Your blabbing is just off the deep end on this one.
The post goes on for a few more words but she finally summarizes...Frozen: Not Going To "Let It Go" When It Advocates Gay Agenda
For me, this is probably one of the most disturbing messages of the movie, Frozen, and of course, the bottom line in the twisted marketing to normalize homosexual behavior and legitimize same-sex marriage in society: the opposition to it is the problem - you.
Love, or romance, is at the heart of the quest for the legalization of SSM, as a human-right. Period. The equality argument is that those who oppose SSM are saying that homosexuals can't equally love, as heterosexuals, or that their love is less than what two heterosexuals feel for each other and thus legalize through "marriage.” For society to continue to bar gays from being married is to say that they are not capable of loving another person, in the same way as two heterosexuals. This narrow campaign is intended to completely disregard the exponential effects of children denied their natural birthright to have both a mother and a father. And when questioned about it, retort by claiming it more evidence of said discrimination, a.k.a, bigotry, hate, intolerance, etc.
This is the simplistic, and selfish, basis for marriage being deemed an equal right, which marriage only between a man and a woman implies by its exclusivity. And the reasons: ignorance, homophobia and discrimination in the same vein as the civil rights argument.
Frozen: Not Going To "Let It Go" When It Advocates Gay Agenda
She goes on to say about how we as parents need to be aware and such but to remind you she still took three sets of grandchildren to this movie and never explained how she sat them down and taught them the intolerance grandma has.
The end of her post she breaks down the lyrics of Let It Go and highlights all the gayness in it.
My point of this is really nothing. Highlighting the fact there is still intolerance riding on the shoulders of a religion mentality in this world. Really at the end of the day a majority of the people in this country only care about one thing, themselves. No one cares who fucks who or how as long as they don't try to fuck someone that doesn't want to be fucked that way. Other than that, keep the shit to yourselves.
As far as the religious warriors go, including this Mormon broad, why do you care? The world is a sinful place and you aren't going to change it. There are 10 commandments and none of them talk about fucking except fucking another man's wife. Of all the moral decay in this country you focus on the one where there is love in it?
If two guys want to play cowboy all night or two woman do a scissors thing, what do you care? They sinned. It's a sin but according to scripture as long as they believe they will be saved, right? You will say no way but turn around and pray for the mass murderer before he gets the needle that if he believes you will be forgiven.
Hate exists because of you. Don't give a fuck and you will be far happier and spend less time reading into things that don't have any meaning.
This has been another Nobody movement.